]> Tjadendevries's blog http://sacramentofordemocracy.org/?q=blog/view/140 An online community of Democracy for America supporters in the greater Sacramento area.enThe Assembly Health Committee approves SB840 http://sacramentofordemocracy.org/?q=node/view/7443 [It doesn't mean that it is over, it's another step in the process. Keep calling your Senator and Assemblyperson] <h3><a href="http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2007/07/assembly_health_1.html" target="_blank">ASSEMBLY HEALTH COMMITTEE PASSES SB 840 AND OTHER MEASURES</a></h3> By Anthony Wright<BR> Executive Director of Health Access California<p> <ul>Tuesday was the last day for Senate health-related bills (aimed to be passed in 2007) to be heard in Assembly Health Committee. The Committee heard testimony into the evening.<P> SB840: First among the bills considered was SB 840, Sen. Shiela Kuehl’s universal, single-payer health reform measure. “If you don’t have single payer, someone is going to get left behind,’’ said Kuehl, in calling on lawmakers to support her legislation.<P>Science Friday: Coriolis Effect: fact or fiction? http://sacramentofordemocracy.org/?q=node/view/7442 <a href="http://oceanworld.tamu.edu/students/currents/currents3.htm" target="_blank"><img src="http://oceanworld.tamu.edu/students/currents/images/coriolis_1A.jpg" width="300" height="200"></a> <h2><a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa029&articleID=72BFCDB6-E7F2-99DF-3775B588904AC6E3" target="_blank">WEIRD SCIENCE</a></h2> June 28, 2007<P> <h3>Fact or Fiction?: South of the Equator Toilets Flush and Tornadoes Spin in the Opposite Direction How small a system can the Coriolis force control?</h3> By Robynne Boyd<P> <ul>Weather isn't always predictable. If it were, daily forecasts would be spot-on, hurricanes anticipated, and picnics safe from abrupt summer downpours. Instead, climate systems are complex, and tornadoes are no exception. So, whereas guessing the direction of a tornado's torque is possible, like any weather prediction the forecast will only be correct most of the time.<P>SiCKO spurs Texans into action http://sacramentofordemocracy.org/?q=node/view/7411 <img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/213/511361968_c1be1e3290.jpg?v=0"><P> <h2><a href="http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Sicko-Spurs-Audiences-Into-Action-5639.html" target="_blank"><font color="red"><font size="7">SiCKO</font></font> Spurs Audiences Into Action</a></h2> By Josh Tyler: 2007-07-01 17:15:27<P> <ul>Long time readers of this site no doubt know that I live in Texas. As everyone knows there’s no more conservative state in the Union than here. And I don’t just live in Texas; I live in the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex. Dallas isn’t some pocket of hippy-dippy behavior. This isn’t Austin. Dallas is the sort of place where guys in cowboy hats still drive around in giant SUV’s with “W” stickers on the back windshield, global warming and Iraq be damned. It’s probably the only spot left in America where you stand a good chance of getting the crap kicked out of you for badmouthing the president.<P> So when I went to see Sicko for a second time this afternoon, I wasn’t sure what to expect from the audience. I wasn’t watching it downtown, where the city’s few elitist liberals congregate and drink expensive lattes. I went to a random mall in the mid-cities, where folks were likely to be just folks. As I sat down, right behind me entered an obligatory, cowboy hat wearing redneck in his 50s. He announced his presence by shouting across the theater in a thick Texas drawl to his already seated wife “you owe me fer seein this!”<P> Sicko started; the stereotypical Texas guy sat down behind me and never stopped talking. He talked through the entire movie… and I listened. The first ten to twenty minutes of the film he spent badmouthing Moore to his wife and snorting in disgust whenever MM went into one of his trademark monologues. But as the movie wore on his protestations became quieter, less enthusiastic. Somewhere along the way, maybe at the half way point, right before my ears, Sicko changed this man’s mind. By the forty-five minute mark, he, along with the rest of the audience were breaking into spontaneous applause. He stopped pooh-poohing the movie and started shouting out “hell yeah!” at the screen. It was as if the whole world had been flipped upside down. This is Texas, where people support the president and voting democratic is something only done by the terrorists.CA SoS Debra Bowen Refuses to Support HR 811 http://sacramentofordemocracy.org/?q=node/view/7345 <h2><a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4754" target="_blank">About two/thirds of the way down</a></h2> <ul>"...CA Secretary of State Debra Bowen is on record, in a recent interview, at refusing to support the Holt bill as it's currently written, due to its many existing flaws. Unlike the majority of other election officials across the nation who oppose it for different reasons, Bowen believes it's not strong enough.<P> "I have worked with the author to try and strengthen the bill, but have not taken a position in support," she told Collins last Wednesday before explaining the dangers of institutionalizing the DRE paper trail, as the Holt bill will do.<P>Operation CYA in full effect: The Boy King Commutes Scooter Libby http://sacramentofordemocracy.org/?q=node/view/7303 [About the picture. What? You expect a bully and a cheat to change?] <h2><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19570172/" target="_blank">Full text of Bush statement on Libby decision</a></h2> <ul><i>President Bush's released a statement Monday sparing former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby from a 2<img src="http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/t/Y/bush_yale_righthook.gif" width="200" height="300" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="10"> 1/2-year prison term. The following is the full text of the document.</i><P> The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit today rejected Lewis Libby's request to remain free on bail while pursuing his appeals for the serious convictions of perjury and obstruction of justice. As a result, Mr. Libby will be required to turn himself over to the Bureau of Prisons to begin serving his prison sentence.<P> I have said throughout this process that it would not be appropriate to comment or intervene in this case until Mr. Libby's appeals have been exhausted. But with the denial of bail being upheld and incarceration imminent, I believe it is now important to react to that decision.<P> From the very beginning of the investigation into the leaking of Valerie Plame's name, I made it clear to the White House staff and anyone serving in my administration that I expected full cooperation with the Justice Department. Dozens of White House staff and administration officials dutifully cooperated.<P> After the investigation was under way, the Justice Department appointed United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois Patrick Fitzgerald as a Special Counsel in charge of the case. Mr. Fitzgerald is a highly qualified, professional prosecutor who carried out his responsibilities as charged.<P> This case has generated significant commentary and debate. Critics of the investigation have argued that a special counsel should not have been appointed, nor should the investigation have been pursued after the Justice Department learned who leaked Ms. Plame's name to columnist Robert Novak. Furthermore, the critics point out that neither Mr. Libby nor anyone else has been charged with violating the Intelligence Identities Protection Act or the Espionage Act, which were the original subjects of the investigation. Finally, critics say the punishment does not fit the crime: Mr. Libby was a first-time offender with years of exceptional public service and was handed a harsh sentence based in part on allegations never presented to the jury.<P>Science Friday: The Boobtube is an opiate ... btw, so is that video game http://sacramentofordemocracy.org/?q=node/view/7198 <font size="4">You are getting sleepy, very sleepy</font> ... ok, not really ... but maybe you are. Read how teevee and video games in the wrong hands could be used to manipulate people, which would be very helpful for ... oh, I don't know ... <a href="http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/LuntzPropagandistOfCentury.html" target="_blank">someone or some people</a> who would want to manipulate us into doing things we would not be normally inclined to do by repeating the message over and over and over again on the teevee. ... <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lDZjiPok3w" target="blank">911, 911, 911</a>. (I'll get to how the Bushies manipulated the voters in a future blog)<P> Don't believe it, about video games? Read all the way through then click on the second picture<P> <h2><a href="http://www.familyresource.com/lifestyles/mental-environment/television-opiate-of-the-masses" target="_blank">Opiates of the Masses</a></h2> <img src="http://www.aci.net/kalliste/spiral.gif" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5">.<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugzcpnPR4YA" target="_blank"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/hzduOQsuYX4/default.jpg" align="right" hspace="5" vspace="5"></a> <ul>... That television you watch every day, your secret best friend, is an addictive opiate, and not only that, it's one of the most potent mind control devices ever produced. And I'm not just basing this on intuition. I have the neurological evidence to prove it.<P> [...]<P> Of course, not all addictions are chemical. Any behavior that leads to a pleasurable experience will be repeated , especially if that behavior requires little work. Psychologists call this pattern "positive reinforcement" . This is what we mean, technically speaking, by addiction. In this sense, television certainly fits into the category of an addictive agent.<P>Democratic Assembly capitulates to hospital lobbyists on patient dumping (SB 275) http://sacramentofordemocracy.org/?q=node/view/7165 <h2><a href="http://www.calitics.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3166" target="_blank">Assembly Democrats Cave on Hospital Dumping (SB275)</a></h2> by: Brian Leubitz<BR> Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 13:58:58 PM PDT<BR> <ul>No politician is perfect. Of that much I am painfully aware. But I like to think that Democrats will stand up for those who cannot <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAmPWOk9pcU" target="_blank"><img src="http://media.npr.org/programs/atc/features/2006/mar/homeless/2.jpg" align="left" hspace="10" vspace="10"></a>speak for themselves. Well, I was proved wrong about that when Lou Correa and Ron Calderon blocked committee approval of SB 275, the ban on hospital dumping. Eventually, it was passed by removing the two Senators, who apparently value and/or fear the AHA (the American Hospitals Association-a corporate lobby group) more than they care about the true toll this takes on real human beings.<P> You know hospital dumping as the practice featured in <font color="red"><b>SiCKO</b></font>. Michael Moore talks about it in this video clip from his premiere for <font color="red"><b>SiCKO</b></font> at Skid Row.<P> So, SB 275 attempts to deal with this problem. Under the bill, as passed by the Senate, the transportation of patients against their will was a crime, not just a finable offense, but a real misdemeanor. Real people could get real convictions for this deplorable practice. The prospect of criminal charges meant that this law would have teeth. Well, the AHA decided that they totally didn't dig on the idea of having their staff arrested for doing what the CEO demanded. So, the Assembly accepted a hostile amendment to neuter the law by removing criminal penalties until the third offense, as if the first two homeless people don't matter.<P> The author, proud progressive, and my personal-favorite senator, Gilbert Cedillo spoke against the hostile amendment.<P> " Our offices have been committed to a thoughtful process on this issue. We do not want to do something that is not significant," said Cedillo.<P>Senate Judiciary Committee issues subpoenas to Bush Administration - Cheney reacts http://sacramentofordemocracy.org/?q=node/view/7131 <h2><a href="http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200706/062707a.html" target="_blank">Office of Senator Leahy</a></h2> <ul> WASHINGTON (Wednesday, June 27) – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), in consultation with Ranking Member Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), issued subpoenas Wednesday for documents relating to the authorization and legal justification for the Administration's warrantless wiretapping program.<P> Chairman Leahy issued subpoenas to the Department of<img src="http://groups.msn.com/_Secure/0RgChAp8V4wcDSIjzd5sMuWTYBkFzcnlqrclINJtgO3n014EcJ0c8d1so!r7DVjHqF4zg!XHJ3OKehqQc!RZ1EFISKlg*ryvJXaA4K4ugEhc/still22.jpg" width="200" height="275" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="10"> Justice, the Office of the White House, the Office of the Vice President and the National Security Council for documents relating to the Committee’s inquiry into the warrantless electronic surveillance program. The subpoenas seek documents related to authorization and reauthorization of the program or programs; the legal analysis or opinions about the surveillance; orders, decisions, or opinions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) concerning the surveillance; agreements between the Executive Branch and telecommunications or other companies regarding liability for assisting with or participating in the surveillance; and documents concerning the shutting down of an investigation of the Department of Justice’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) relating to the surveillance.<P> “Over the past 18 months, this Committee has made no fewer than nine formal requests to the Department of Justice and to the White House, seeking information and documents about the authorization of and legal justification for this program,” Chairman Leahy wrote in letters accompanying the subpoenas to Bush Administration officials. “All requests have been rebuffed. Our attempts to obtain information through testimony of Administration witnesses have been met with a consistent pattern of evasion and misdirection.”<P> “There is no legitimate argument for withholding the requested materials from this Committee,” Leahy wrote. “The Administration cannot thwart the Congress’s conduct of its constitutional duties with sweeping assertions of secrecy and privilege. The Committee seeks no intimate operational facts and we are willing to accommodate legitimate redactions of the documents we seek to eliminate reference to these details.”<P>Why am I getting a "Seven Days in May" vibe? http://sacramentofordemocracy.org/?q=node/view/7080 <a href="http://www.destgulch.com/movies/7days/" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film/DVDReviews5/sevendaysinmay/title.JPG" width="350" height="150"></a> <h2><a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/earlywarning/2007/06/special_operations_prepared_fo.html?nav=rss_blog" target="_blank">Special Operations Prepared for Domestic Missions</a></h2> By William M. Arkin | June 22, 2007; 7:32 AM ET<BR> Washington Post<P> <ul>The U.S. Northern Command, the military command responsible for "homeland defense," has asked the Pentagon if it can establish its own special operations command for domestic missions. The request, reported in the Washington Examiner, would establish a permanent sub-command for responses to incidents of domestic terrorism as well as other occasions where special operators may be necessary on American soil.<P> The establishment of a domestic special operations mission, and the preparation of contingency plans to employ commandos in the United States, would upend decades of tradition. Military actions within the United States are the responsibility of state militias (the National Guard), and federal law enforcement is a function of the FBI.<P>Ist Derr Boobengrabber Totenkopf? http://sacramentofordemocracy.org/?q=node/view/7035 Notice anything strange here? Besides the <a href="http://www.startribune.com/stonline/images/news7/1cali0809.l.jpg" target="_blank">creepy</a> <a href="http://shmais.com/img/largepics/image3110.jpg" target="_blank">blue</a> <a href="http://bagnewsnotes.typepad.com/bagnews/images/_us.yimg.com_p_ap_20050112_capt.carf11001122221.western_storm_la_conchita_carf110.jpg" target="_blank">ring </a>he usually wears.<P> Click to enlarge<BR><a href="http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/2007/1101070625_400.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/2007/1101070625_400.jpg" width="200" height="300"></a><P> And that he's not wearing the creepy blue ring but what appears to be a ring with a skull on it (what!?!); what's with the <a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2007/180607Schwarzenegger.htm" target="_blank">Totenkopfverbände belt buckle</a>?<P> <h2><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totenkopfverb%C3%A4nde" target="_blank">A few things about Totenkopfverbände</a> (Deaths Head Division)</h2> <ul>... the Skull or "Death's Head" Formations — were made up of Nazi Germany's camp guards. During World War II the SS-TV also provided troops for one of the first combat units of the Waffen-SS, the Totenkopfdivision, which eventually evolved into one of Nazi Germany's most formidable combat formations.</ul> <h2><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Division_Totenkopf" target="_blank">More</a></h2>Those are drumbeats of MORE war. Do you hear them? http://sacramentofordemocracy.org/?q=node/view/6965 <h3><a href="http://www.moonofalabama.org/2007/06/progress-in-the.html" target="_blank">Nearly unnoticed Congress (Democratic majority) yesterday (Wednesday June 20th) declared all but open war on Iran. The House passed <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.CON.RES.21:" target="_blank">Resolution 21</a>:</a></h3> <blockquote>Calling on the United Nations Security Council to charge Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad with violating the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide and the United Nations Charter because of his calls for the destruction of the State of Israel.</blockquote><a href="http://www.bushflash.com/signals.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.teeth.com.pk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/irannext.jpg" align="left" hspace="10" vspace="10"></a> Only two representatives voted against the resolution. Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul.<BR> Paul said:<P> <ul> This resolution is an exercise in propaganda that serves one purpose: to move us closer to initiating a war against Iran. Citing various controversial statements by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, this legislation demands that the United Nations Security Council charge Ahmadinejad with violating the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.<P> Having already initiated a disastrous war against Iraq citing UN resolutions as justification, this resolution is like déja-vu. Have we forgotten 2003 already? Do we really want to go to war again for UN resolutions? That is where this resolution, and the many others we have passed over the last several years on Iran, is leading us. I hope my colleagues understand that a vote for this bill is a vote to move us closer to war with Iran.<P> Clearly, language threatening to wipe a nation or a group of people off the map is to be condemned by all civilized people. And I do condemn any such language. But why does threatening Iran with a pre-emptive nuclear strike, as many here have done, not also deserve the same kind of condemnation? Does anyone believe that dropping nuclear weapons on Iran will not wipe a people off the map? When it is said that nothing, including a nuclear strike, is off the table on Iran, are those who say it not also threatening genocide? And we wonder why the rest of the world accuses us of behaving hypocritically, of telling the rest of the world “do as we say, not as we do.” ...</ul> What exactly did Ahmadinejad say?<P> <a href="http://www.juancole.com/2006/05/hitchens-hacker-and-hitchens.html" target="_blank">Professor Juan Cole explains</a><P>Science Friday: Build a radio that needs no batteries OR electricity http://sacramentofordemocracy.org/?q=node/view/6928 <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=GkdYBIS-NSI" target="_blank"><img src="http://blog.wired.com/geekdad/crystalSet-1.jpg"></a> <h2><a href="http://blog.wired.com/geekdad/2007/04/radios_that_wor.html" target="_blank">From geekdads @ wired.com</a></h2> <ul>Crystal Radios are an old standby of GeekDads. For the early mists of time Geekdads have been showing kids how to pull radio stations from thin air with the barest snips from the basement. Here are some very simple radios that you can have your kid make in a few hours. They seem too simple to work. But unbelievably they can hear music or talk programs coming out of this scraps of metal. How does it work?<p> Aha! Glad you asked. They use the ingredients of the first radios, solid state bits of matter wired up in various circuits, including long antennas and coil tuners.<P>Why is Homer Simpson running the California DFG? Or Isn't that what they used to say about DDT? http://sacramentofordemocracy.org/?q=node/view/6927 <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=ABdIIGOr-UM" target="_blank"><img src="http://hnonline.sk/attachment.php/11903910/isu48BFHIJKLNj6PWbdfgpqxyz01SURV/20050121_v_homer-simpson5.jpg" width="250" height="200"></a>.<a href="http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/images/flashback/1996/large/9602.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/images/flashback/1996/large/9602.jpg" width="225" height="200"></a> <h2><a href="http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/233993.html" target="_blank">No human hazard seen in using poison against predator in Lake Davis.</a></h2> By Jane Braxton Little - Bee Correspondent<BR> Published 12:00 am PDT Thursday, June 21, 2007<BR> Story appeared in METRO section, Page B4<P> <ul>PORTOLA -- A $12 million plan to rid Lake Davis of invasive northern pike has cleared one of the final hurdles to permitting state officials to apply chemicals to the Plumas County reservoir.<P> A study by the state Department of Health Services determined the toxic chemicals would have no short- or long-term adverse health effects on Lake Davis or surrounding wells used for drinking water.<P> "Detection levels for these contaminants are below levels known to be safe," the 13-page report concludes.</ul> Really??? Not so much according the MSDS [<a href="http://www.prentiss.com/msds/pdf/CFT%20Legumine%20MSDS.pdf" target="_blank">PDF File</a>] which says ... <blockquote>SECTION 2: HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION SUMMARY<P> KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN – DANGER – POISONOUS – Fatal if inhaled. May be fatal if swallowed. Causes substantial, but temporary, eye injury. Causes skin irritation. Do not breathe spray mist. Do not get in eyes, on skin, or on clothing. Wear goggles or safety glasses. This product is an orange, viscous liquid with slight petroleum odor.</blockquote>D.C. Circuit Court Denies Habeus Corpus Rights to Gitmo Detainees http://sacramentofordemocracy.org/?q=node/view/6853 <h2><a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2007/06/detainee_ruling.html" target="_blank">Detainee ruling put into effect by Circuit Court</a></h2> <ul>The D.C. Circuit Court on Wednesday, after pondering the issue for more than two months, on Wednesday refused to delay any longer putting into effect its decision that Guantanamo Bay detainees have lost all rights to pursue habeas challenges to their prolonged imprisonment. In a brief order, the panel that ruled against the detainees on Feb. 20 formally denied a request filed in April by detainees' lawyers not to issue the mandate and to hold the cases on its docket for several more months. The panel that had issued the Feb. 20 ruling, though split 2-1 then, unanimously denied the motion to hold the case, giving no explanation. It also found moot other requests by detainees' lawyers for legal relief.<P>General Petraeus wants 20 more FU's for Iraq http://sacramentofordemocracy.org/?q=node/view/6767 <a href="http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k88/Duke_S/Thomas_Friedman.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k88/Duke_S/Thomas_Friedman.jpg" width="200" height="350" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="10"></a> <h2><a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/06/17/general-petraeus-historically-counter-insurgency-ops-have-gone-at-least-9-or-10-years/" target="_blank">Petraeus: “Historically, Counter-Insurgency Ops Have Gone At Least 9 or 10 Years”</a></h2> <ul>In his first interview on a Sunday talk show, (who could have predicted he’d go to Fox, first?) Top U.S. Commander in Iraq, General David Petraeus talks to Chris Wallace on “Fox News Sunday” about the progress of the ongoing military surge in Iraq. With the recent revelation that U.S. forces only control 40% of Baghdad, Wallace contends that this operation will take a long-term commitment (see the Korean model) and asks Petraeus if it’s time for the government to “square up” with the American public about how long the occupation will last. The General’s response lays the groundwork for lowered expectations for the upcoming deadline in September when he is to report to Congress…<p> <blockquote>Petraeus: ” I think just about everybody out there recognizes that a situation like this with the many, many challenges that Iraq is contending with is not one that’s going to be resolved in a year or even two years. In fact, typically - I think historically, counter-insurgency operations have gone at least nine or ten years.”</blockquote></ul> What's a Friedman Unit?<p> <h3><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedman_%28unit%29" target="_blank">Glad you asked</a></h3> <ul>The Friedman, or Friedman Unit (F.U.), is a tongue-in-cheek neologism coined by blogger Atrios (Duncan Black) on May 21, 2006.[1] A Friedman is a unit of time equal to six months.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8] The Huffington Post cited it as the "Best New Phrase" of 2006.[9]<P>